Kierkegaard And Nietzsche`s Ideas Of Existentialism

Kierkegaard , Nietzsche and ExistentialismAlthough their works and philosophical flavors predated the existential philosophy movement by more years , Soren Kierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche are often considered founding fathers of existentialism This is not to say that separately philosopher s effects were identical . While they did share similarities , each had their profess unique vista that was quite pronounced . For Kierkegaard , on that point is an overwhelming notion present that pack ultimately unafraid(p) themselves base on their reaction to truth . That is , people designate a certain opinion system and then that belief system reacts to what is true . For framework , it is true that biography exists , scarce an atheist and a devoutly religious person whitethorn have completely different outlooks on w here behavior originates . As such , the centre of life derives from an internalization of what is outwardly cover . This may bring about the question What is true for accepted absolute truth exists and there can not be two sides to truth . From this , we move on to NietzscheNietzsche possessed a much harder edged approach to truth because he sought-after(a) to go directly to the root of what is true and hack outside at unessential material that obstructed truth . For example , in Nietzsche s criticism or art he considers the lesson lessons a playwright may attempt to teach as inherently off-key because the world of the story effectd to put by the notion of incorruptible truths was created exclusively by the playwright (artist ) so as to create a world that perceived moral lesson . In new(prenominal) words , the theme is not only if true because it derives from a purely manufactured world designed to sell the truthVery hardly a(prenominal) philosophical movements are as misconceive as existentialism . For! many , existentialism s outlook that peerless must involve life on its own merits appertains purely to looking at the negative nature of life . In short , existentialism is little more than glorified cynicism .

This wrong definition is based on a number of false premises not the least of which is assuming facts not in evidence In other words , seeing life based on its own merits refers that there is emphasis on a lack of hope and a lack of peremptory beliefs . Again , this is anomalous because if an existential philosopher believes that people are inherently good and that chastity is the central tenant of human beings then seeing life on its own merits may refer to a belief tha t all human action is inherently good . This is distant from a misanthropical outlook granted , many existentialist philosophers did not have such a bright eyeball outlook on the world and the people who inhabited it , exclusively this was not because they were cynical , but because they were realists who looked at life equal it actually was and in looking at life as it was they understood that humans created who they were in call of creating their identity , their outlook on the word and , to a undischarged extent , their own self worth and meaning . This meaning could be cynical , it could be gullible or it...If you wish to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.